APA
Click to copy
Fernandes, J. D., Sarabipour, S., Smith, C., Niemi, N. M., Jadavi, N., Kozik, A. J., … Haage, A. (2020). Research Culture: A survey-based analysis of the academic job market. ELife, 9. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54097
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Fernandes, Jason D, Sarvenaz Sarabipour, Christopher Smith, Natalie M Niemi, Nafisa Jadavi, Ariangela J Kozik, Alex S Holehouse, et al. “Research Culture: A Survey-Based Analysis of the Academic Job Market.” eLife 9 (2020).
MLA
Click to copy
Fernandes, Jason D., et al. “Research Culture: A Survey-Based Analysis of the Academic Job Market.” ELife, vol. 9, 2020, doi:10.7554/eLife.54097.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{jason2020a,
title = {Research Culture: A survey-based analysis of the academic job market},
year = {2020},
journal = {eLife},
volume = {9},
doi = {10.7554/eLife.54097},
author = {Fernandes, Jason D and Sarabipour, Sarvenaz and Smith, Christopher and Niemi, Natalie M and Jadavi, Nafisa and Kozik, Ariangela J and Holehouse, Alex S and Pejaver, Vikas and Symmons, Orsolya and Filho, Alexandre W Bisson and Haage, Amanda}
}
Amanda L. Mollet, Ada Hagan, You Cheng, A. Kozik, Christopher T. Smith, Amanda Haage, Nafisa M. Jadavji
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 2025
Ariangela J Kozik, Ada K Hagan, Nafisa Jadavi, Christopher Smith, Amanda Haage
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, vol. 17(1), 2024, pp. 16-37
An updated and expanded characterization of the biological sciences academic job market
Brooklyn Flynn, Ariangela J Kozik, You Cheng, Ada K Hagan, Jennifer Ng, Christopher Smith, Amanda Haage, Nafisa Jadavi
Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, vol. 9, 2024
Research Culture: A survey-based analysis of the academic job market
Jason D Fernandes, Sarvenaz Sarabipour, Christopher Smith, Natalie M Niemi, Nafisa Jadavi, Ariangela J Kozik, Alex S Holehouse, Vikas Pejaver, Orsolya Symmons, Alexandre W Bisson Filho, Amanda Haage
eLife, vol. 9, 2020
title: 'Research Culture: A survey-based analysis of the academic job market' authors: - Jason D Fernandes - Sarvenaz Sarabipour - csmith - Natalie M Niemi - njadavji - akozik - Alex S Holehouse - Vikas Pejaver - Orsolya Symmons - Alexandre W Bisson Filho - ahaage date: '2020-06-12T00:00:00Z' doi: '10.7554/eLife.54097'
publishDate: '2017-01-01T00:00:00Z'
publication_types: ['2']
publication: 'eLife' publication_short: ''
abstract: 'Many postdoctoral researchers apply for faculty positions knowing relatively little about the hiring process or what is needed to secure a job offer. To address this lack of knowledge about the hiring process we conducted a survey of applicants for faculty positions: the survey ran between May 2018 and May 2019, and received 317 responses. We analyzed the responses to explore the interplay between various scholarly metrics and hiring outcomes. We concluded that, above a certain threshold, the benchmarks traditionally used to measure research success – including funding, number of publications or journals published in – were unable to completely differentiate applicants with and without job offers. Respondents also reported that the hiring process was unnecessarily stressful, time-consuming, and lacking in feedback, irrespective of outcome. Our findings suggest that there is considerable scope to improve the transparency of the hiring process.'
summary: Many postdoctoral researchers apply for faculty positions knowing relatively little about the hiring process or what is needed to secure a job offer. Our findings suggest that there is considerable scope to improve the transparency of the hiring process.
tags: - Source Themes featured: false
url_pdf: https://elifesciences.org/articles/54097 url_code: '' url_dataset: '' url_poster: '' url_project: '' url_slides: '' url_source: '' url_video: ''
featured.jpg/png to your page's folder.image: caption: '' focal_point: '' preview_only: false
internal-project references content/project/internal-project/index.md.projects: [].projects: []
slides: "example" references content/slides/example/index.md.slides: "".